Wednesday, May 28, 2014

American Hustle, Jennifer Lawrence exposed as Hollywood lies in India Legal fortnightly mag by Editor Indy Badhwar

India Legal-BEHIND THE SCENES/arts&entertainment/american hustle


                                          LIES TRUTH AND SHOWMANSHIP
 New Delhi's  India Legal mag  first person insider account by Jack Anderson's Indy Badhwar of how the hollywood blockbuster has carved out self-serving, fairy tale  fantasy from the reality of a horror story

                                                               By Inderjit Badhwar



More than 30 years after I wrote a series of the most explosive stories I have ever done as an investigative reporter, the subject and the characters who populated it have come alive again—on the big screen, in halls all across India and the world. The Hollywood  box office runaway  blockbuster is titled  American Hustle. Directed by David O. Russell, it stars, among others, Christian Bale, Amy Adams, Bradley Cooper, and Jennifer Lawrence. American Hustle was all set for about 10 Oscars.

The movie is based on a sting operation conducted in 1979-1980 by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) that led to the conviction of a U.S. senator Pete Williams of New Jersey) and six congressmen (members of the House of Representatives) on corruption charges. It was dubbed “ABSCAM”  for “Arab Scam” because  the FBI agents involved created a fake corporation and posed as rich Arab investors who would pay bribes to elected officials in order to get investment opportunities in their states. The FBI’s star sting man – the middle man who lured the unsuspecting politicians into the trap before hidden video cameras --  was a convicted conman and swindler Mel Weinberg (the Irving Rosenfeld character played in the film by Bale).

There are troubling ethical issues involved in this film. The FBI agents emerge as heroes. All the politicians as crooks. Weinberg/Rosenfeld as an amiable, jovial trickster. And his wife Rosalyn (Marie Weinberg in real life) as a drunken, brazen hussy. I am a sworn enemy of censorship. And as an author I know that poetic license and cinematic adaptations are legitimate creative activities. But what happens when  a film like American Hustle which, by the admission of its makers, is based on “facts”, distorts facts, glamorizes the actual wrongdoers including the FBI and Weinberg (Rosenfeld), and shamelessly defames and slanders the character of Marie (Rosalyn) who was one the most tragic victims of that scam? Lawrence's performance as Marie/Rosalyn as an over-the-top slut, which is now becoming clear is a selling point for the movie. What if you knew that in real life, Weinberg was on the take with the knowledge and connivance of the FBI, and his wife committed “suicide” after she exposed the sham in public? Notwithstanding American Hustle’s  cinematic virtues – would you support its iconic status?

The real story behind Abscam, as I know it and as I told it, is as dramatic as the film. But it is a sordid tale of deception, treachery, criminality with the shoe on the other foot: the bad guys are Rosenfeld (Weinberg) and the FBI agents. The heroine is Rosalyn (Marie) who was one of America’s greatest whistleblowers and paid for her courage with her life in 1982.

It was to me that she came first with the real story.

I was then a senior investigative reporter for the legendary Jack Anderson-- ABC TV, Parade Magazine, plus a daily column that ran in 1000 papers worldwide. I was with Jack for about 8 years, replacing Brit Hume who had joined a broadcast company. Initially, the transcripts of the secretly-videoed Abscam  tapes showing congressmen accepting bribes were leaked by the FBI to my colleague Gary Cohn , and the Jack Anderson Column reproduced them (late 1980’s) in what was considered the scoop of the decade. Pre-trial publicity had a lot to do with the speedy convictions. The FBI was riding a wave of glory.

But when the judicial  indictments started coming down and some of the trials began,  I convinced Jack that we do a reverse look at our scoop because I had learned that some of the congressmen and senators may have been  pre-selected for the sting operation because they were actually pro-Teddy Kennedy Democrats who had been opposed to Jimmy Carter: that the FBI Director  William Webster had approved the sting based on names and political standing rather than on any investigation of ongoing criminality or even a predilection to criminal behavior.

 I viewed this as entrapment and ran a series of stories, damning Abscam as a violation of America's system of Justice, wrongful entrapment, and  produced memos  showing that some of the district attorneys and FBI agents did not approve of the methods and believed that Senator Williams had been falsely implicated.

 It was an unpopular position to take because the rest of the American press had already declared the undercover agents and Weinberg as heroes who had brought down crooked politicians. My view was that these politicians were not all crooked but were tempted mercilessly, remorseless and tenaciously until they succumbed to temptation. It is not the state’s business to convert otherwise honest people into criminals. Law enforcement means catching and preventing crimes, not creating criminals.

This worried William Webster so much that he requested a meeting with me and Jack Anderson at the FBI headquarters in Washington to ask for a "truce." His agents had been tailing us trying to discover the source of my leaked memos. We knew this. All of us, including my partner Jack Mitchell (former chief investigator, Senate Committee on Aging) caught them snooping brazenly from parked cars outside our Washington office.

 Webster told me and Jack (Anderson) that he had been informed that we had bugged his office through a rogue FBI agent by the name of  Ed Tickle! This was hilarious. The deal he tried to offer was that we would lay off embarrassing the FBI on ABSCAM for, maybe, some special scoops in return . Jack played the good guy I played the toughie but nothing came of it. (This is well documented by Jack in his great book: Peace, War and Politics, published just before his death in 2005)

Then all  hell began to break loose. Mel Weinberg's (Irvin Rosenfeld in the film) wife Marie (Rosalyn in the film), was  a frail, 50-year old bleach-dyed blonde diabetic with a strong Brooklyn accent, who lived with her adopted  son,  J.R. in Tequesta Florida.(How different she was from the over-the-top, conniving slut depicted as Rosalyn in the Hollywood film). She had been following my reportage and called me out of the blue, told me my hunches were correct, and that she really wanted to give me some inside dope. She said her phone may be tapped.

I flew down, checked in at a motel, then moved to another for the meeting and what she told me was stunning. ABSCAM, she said, was a scam within a scam. It was bankrolled through unaccounted funds placed in the Chase Manhattan Bank. Also Weinberg was doing a double scam. He was actually not only pocketing some of the bribe money meant for the targets (and giving kickbacks to his FBI handlers) but also extorting the targets  for "incentive gifts" like colour TV sets, microwave ovens, VCR's , in order  to expedite the deals. She also said he had perjured himself during the trials and the FBI knew about it. The two FBI collaborators involved were FBI agents John Good and Tony Amoroso (played by Bradley Cooper in the film). I secretly taped her conversation with me in  the motel room as well as while driving around with her in a rented car the next day. To my surprise, within a couple of weeks, snatches of this taped conversation would be played back to me and my wife by anonymous callers to my home in Rockville, Maryland. Maybe that was the FBI's way of letting me know they knew what I had been up to, and to lay off.  (I later shared this information with Senators Daniel Inoue of Hawaii and Orrin Hatch of Utah who were on the Senate Ethics Committee that indicted one of the ABSCAM targets Senator Pete Williams of New Jersey and forced him to resign.)

Why did Marie blow the whistle on her husband?

In the film, her character is portrayed as a drunken adulteress, who has been described by those involved with the production as "manipulative", "really sick" and "crazy." However, the truth is something far different. The real story had ended in tragedy.  
By 1981, the Weinbergs were living in central Florida, and Marie discovered that the 57 year-old Weinberg had a longtime mistress, Evelyn Knight, 39,( Sydney Prosser, played by Amy Adams in the film) who was eleven years her junior. He had set her up in a condo 15 miles away, and the name "Weinberg" had been posted out front. She soon discovered that Knight had also legally changed her last name to her own. Marie, who was raised in a foster home and suffered from diabetes, had been devoted to Weinberg and her adoptive teenage son. I got to know her as a kind, generous and friendly woman.  
Weinberg immediately began to warn her to remain quiet, because a movie deal was planned for John Belushi to portray Weinberg as a hero. He also wanted her to remain silent about the fact that he had extorted expensive gifts and pocketed bribe money during Abscam, something that others were alleging, and the FBI then began to harass her as well, both by phone and in person.  
She immediately moved toward a divorce, and fought back the only way she could: by going public. She turned to investigative Jack Anderson and me. The  intimidation from Weinberg soon became both public and private. After a number of explosive articles by Jack and myself, she appeared on ABC's 20/20 in January of 1982 in an interview arranged by me with Tom Jariell through producer Gordon Freedman. 
They verified Marie's allegations (as government investigators would later), and at that point the intimidation intensified. Weinberg had promised that he would spread ugly stories about her, which he immediately did, in order to have their son taken from her. A pastor that she had turned to was worried she might attempt suicide, which she denied.  
But five days after the broadcast, and after nearly three months of both public and private intimidation and harassment, she apparently took her own life by hanging herself, and left a note behind blaming her husband, saying that she didn't have the strength to fight him anymore. (see box)
Shortly before Marie was to appear before the Senate, I received a call from her son, J.R from Florida, saying  Marie was missing and that it was  unlike her not to return home by 9 pm latest.

The following day --it was January end, 1982 - I was in Jack's office on 14th St NW in Washington DC. J.R. called me to say Marie was found dead in a vacant adjoining condominium in Jupiter, Florida.  The police report filed almost immediately said it was a suicide. She had apparently tied a rope to a rung in the top most banister of a wooden staircase leading to the second floor, tied a noose around her neck, climbed down as far as she could until the noose tightened and then bobbed her head up and down und strangulated herself. Her hair was in perfect shape and well permed. She was wearing rouge and lipstick and eye shadow and had powdered her face. In the living room was a round table, a vase with a single rose in it, a pen and a notepad on which she had apparently written a suicide note.

I asked a New York investigator/lawyer, Michael Dennis to rush to Florida as Marie's family representative. He met J.R. and got a copy of the "suicide note". He then told me that there was no inquest. The next day, Mel "buried" Marie in an empty casket while her body was still in the morgue. The pastor did not know  this. He probably did this to avoid a formal inquest. The actual burial took place a day later.

But nothing else came of it. The world just went on. Marie was quickly forgotten. Although she was found hanged at the end of January 1982 nobody raised the issue or even discussed her sworn affidavit and accusations at  the Senate hearing on Senator Pete Williams’s expulsion  a month later. Later, Pete Williams went to jail. America buried another scandal.
Afterward, Weinberg continued to attack Marie and blamed others for her tragic demise, including Jack and myself. Little more than a month after Marie's death, Weinberg married his mistress Evelyn Knight.  
The movie did not materialize then, but after several attempts over the years it now finally has, with the Weinberg character once again as the likable conman. But thanks to the internet and social media several  websites now mention the real story, including Slate, Time magazine, The Daily Beast, History vs. Hollywood, New York magazine (through Vulture.com), Yahoo movies, The American Thinker and NBC news.com.  
As one blogger noted: “I understand that changes can, will, and in general must be made to turn life into film. But I think we should examine those changes, especially when they stifle the characterization of a woman who has only ever been characterized by her husband. Especially when it’s another way that the living Mel Weinberg gets to keep his voice, while his dead ex-wife loses hers. And especially when we’ve turned her into fodder for comedy, laughing at her unhappiness, social anxiety, and depression. David O. Russell did a disservice to Marie Weinberg and to Jennifer Lawrence. He further gaslighted a woman who’d been gaslighted…”
Post Script:
And Weinberg, now 90 years old,  admits being paid a quarter million dollars for the film, and even now continues to attack his late wife, telling Newsday that she was a "wacky broad." To celebrate and promote  Weinberg at this point would not only boost the ego of a corrupt and amoral man, but would further demean a woman who was one of history's most tragic victims.
Shortly after I wrote about Marie’s tragedy, 1982,  Mel, through a common source, threatened to break both  my legs if I ever stepped into Florida. The following year, United Features Syndicate,  which syndicated our column “Washington Merry-go-Round” nominated me for the Pulitzer for the series of columns and reporting on Abscam.  I’m sure the Pulitzer Committee, even though I am an alumnus of Columbia’s Graduate School of Journalism,  must have considered  that as some kind a perverted joke considering that most American editors at the time regarded Weinberg as some kind of national hero for nailing a bunch of crooked politicians.
American Hustle promotes this mythmaking which took a heavy toll of a human beings and the American system of justice.
                                --with Ron Kolb in Florida, USA




No comments: